Comment | Racism in Football: Are Black Players Kicking Themselves?
Blogs, Ceasefire Bites, Ideas, New in Ceasefire - Posted on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 0:00 - 1 Comment
In the premiership, Kick It Out‘s fortnight has just come to an end, but for once it is actually in the spotlight somewhat. Kick It Out is an anti-racism campaign in the Football League, set up twelve years ago to attempt to combat racism that occurs at matches. Last week a number of Black players took what some saw as a controversial stance and refused to wear the Kick It Out warm up tops.
Jason Roberts of reading was most vocal in why he refused to wear it, saying that in what’s happened over the past year in football, notably with regards to the Louis Suarez and John Terry cases, he felt that he couldn’t support an organisation that he believed wasn’t doing enough to combat racism.
John Terry received a four match ban as opposed to the 8 match ban Suarez received for an arguably comparable offence, supposedly because there was no way of determining whether Terry was using the slur as an insult or questioning what Anton Ferdinand thought he had said. Regardless, many think that a four match ban in the premiership (Terry is not banned from Champions League games) is not adequate, not to mention the discrepancy between the courts finding Terry not guilty and the FA finding him guilty.
A number of other Black players including Anton Ferdinand’s brother Rio, also refused to wear the shirt. Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson made a statement addressing Rio’s choice, stating he wanted solidarity within the team and that Rio would be dealt with.
At its simplest, the criticism being levelled at Kick It Out is that it does not really have any power to impose or review bans or fines on players, a prerogative of the FA. However, it is important that some Black players had taken part in their act of protest, as it has drawn attention to the fact that the way racism has been dealt with in the most popular league in the world is unacceptable.
The discrepancies between bans are absurd; back in 2003 Rio Ferdinand was banned for 8 months and fined £50,000 for missing a drugs test, despite successfully passing another within 48 hours.
Peter Herbert is a barrister and member of the Society of Black Lawyers who is intending to start up a black player’s union. Black-led unions have a long history in Britain of addressing issues of racial discrimination which mainstream unions don’t have the capacity, understanding or willingness to engage in. During the 1960s organisations like the Coordinating Committee Against Racial Discrimination (CCARD) which was made up of a coalition of African, Caribbean and Asian trade unions organised for Black and White activists to demonstrate against the Immigration Act, and wage discrepancies between African Caribbean and Asians workers, and their white counterparts.
Last week Herbert revealed that he has made a formal complaint to the Metropolitan Police about premiership referee Mark Clattenburg, and they have begun an investigation into alleged ‘inappropriate racial language’ directed at two Chelsea players. With incidences like these happening more frequently the issue is becoming ever more pertinent.
Furthermore, the recent England under-21 game in Serbia ended with England player Danny Rose being racially abused by Serbian fans, and then subsequently being sent off for kicking the ball away into the stands in frustration. Despite clear evidence, the Serbian FA deny any wrongdoing, and instead referred to Rose’s behaviour as unacceptable.
It is clear that reforms need to be made to the way racism is handled at football matches, and it needs to start here, with “the best league in the world”.
Leave a Reply
- Comment | Beyond Prevent: How to Really Defeat Violent Extremism
- Analysis | Borders are a weapon of racism and austerity, not a solution to either
- Comment | To Leave or Not to Leave the EU: A British Muslim Perspective
- Analysis | Billionaire Republicans and Professional Islamophobes: The Pro-Israel lobby in Brussels
- Analysis | Their Violence, Our Values: A History of European Responses to Political Dissent
More In Politics
- Analysis | Burning Down the House: The Danger of Normalising Trump’s Fascism
- Comment | Anti-Imperialism: A Short Guide in 7 Steps
- Comment | Growing international recognition of Western Sahara offers new hope for Africa’s Last Colony
- Politics | “We are the lions, Mr. Manager”: Revisiting the Great Grunwick Strike
- Comment | The Government’s Extremism Bill will do little to prevent extremism and much to undermine democracy and civil liberties
More In Features
- Special Report | “The world has a responsibility to get this blockade on Gaza lifted”: Women’s Boat to Gaza illegally detained by Israel
- Special Report | Does the Prevent strategy have any credibility left?
- Special Report | “Solidarity is being criminalised”: Anger as Greek police raids refugee housing squats and camps
- Special Report | Miracles and Mirages: Greed and corruption have created a doping epidemic in Sport
- Special Report | From Women Refugees to International Students: The State’s War on Migrants
More In Profiles
More In Arts & Culture
- Books | Review | Corbyn: The Strange Rebirth of Radical Politics
- Film | Review | The Journey from Syria: “I wish we could have this life in our country”
- Film | Review | Batman v Superman: Dawn of Nihilism and Mansplaining
- Books | Review | ‘Burning Country: Syrians in Revolution and War’
- Film | Review | The Big Short: Laughter in the Dark