. This victory shows we can, and must, shut down the DSEI arms fair for good | Ceasefire Magazine

This victory shows we can, and must, shut down the DSEI arms fair for good Comment

Last week, eight human rights protesters won a historical legal victory against DSEI, the world's biggest arms fair. This is a remarkable milestone on the way to banning such shameful events, argues Andrew Smith.

New in Ceasefire, Politics - Posted on Friday, April 22, 2016 17:39 - 0 Comments


(Source: http://www.organizedrage.com)

(Source: http://www.organizedrage.com)

Last Friday, protesters and the media poured into Stratford Magistrates Court. Though a small court usually hosting neighbourly disputes and family proceedings, it was last week host to a week-long probe into the conduct and legality of the DSEI arms fair, which takes place in East London every two years.

In the dock were eight peaceful protesters who had been charged with blocking the roads to stop the weapons from entering the event last September.

UK courts have rarely been friendly towards anti-arms trade campaigners, so many expected the proceedings to be a foregone conclusion. However, it quickly became clear that this was not going to be an ordinary trial.

Arguing that they were acting to prevent greater crimes from taking place, the protesters offered a political defence that quickly turned the tables on Clarion, the company in charge of organising the DSEI, and put UK arms export policy under the microscope.

The court heard about illegal weapons being advertised at previous events, UK arms being sold to despots, like the Saudi regime, for use in war zones, and UK complicity in the oppression taking place in countries like Bahrain and Turkey.

One defendant, Isa Al-Aali, had fled his home in Bahrain in 2013 after being beaten and tortured by the Bahraini police for taking part in peaceful protests following the ‘Arab Spring’ uprising. Isa used his defence to highlight the UK government’s collusion in the ongoing crackdown and its support for the police force that had abused him. His defence was clear and robust:

“I am against arms sales because the Bahraini regime gets arms through this fair and I was a victim. Our people are being victimised by the regime, which is being supported by the UK through the sale of arms.”

Another defendant, Lisa Butler, gave first hand testimony of the repression she had witnessed in Kurdistan from Turkish forces, “I was aiming at preventing crimes in Turkey. I believe that in the DSEI arms fair which we were trying to stop there were crimes being committed in relation to the sale of weapons.”

The activists were supported expert witnesses from Amnesty International, the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy, Campaign Against Arms Trade and Corruption Watch, all of whom used their evidence to draw attention to the human rights abuses and destruction linked to UK military and political support.

In particular, the expert witnesses highlighted the support received by human rights abusers, and the deadly consequences of UK arms being used in war zones like Yemen, where UK fighter jets and bombs have been central to the Saudi-led bombing campaign and the resulting humanitarian catastrophe.

Faced with a strong and compelling defence, and a weak Crown case, the campaigners were acquitted of all charges. In summarising, the Judge couldn’t be clearer. As well as pointing out that the police had ignored claims of illegality on the part of the organisers, his verdict referenced “Clear, credible and largely unchallenged evidence from the expert witnesses of wrongdoing at DSEI and compelling evidence that it took place in 2015.”

The result was met by spontaneous applause from the public gallery and celebrations in the streets outside the court, but its ramifications will go wider than that trial and that afternoon. As it was a verdict in a magistrates court, it may not be legally binding and will have little in the way of informative legal weight in future cases, but it has a clear symbolic value and has set an important political precedent.

The verdict has helped to expose the moral bankruptcy of DSEI and similar events. The government and the organisers always try to maintain the fiction that it is a well-run and legitimate event. They say that it is part of a ‘rigorous’ and ‘robust’ arms export policy. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth, and the judge’s verdict only provides further evidence of this.

Events such as DSEI do not come from nowhere. In fact, they can not happen without government support. Government ministers are key to the promotion of DSEI, so is UK Trade & Investment’s Defence & Security Organisation (UKTI DSO), a 130-strong government department that exists solely to promote arms exports. It is responsible for coordinating the presence of MoD officials and military personnel, as well as inviting international delegations.

There are calls for the government and the Metropolitan Police to investigate the judgement, but that won’t be enough.

Arms fairs like DSEI can never be legitimate or acceptable. Not only do they strengthen the UK’s ties to dictatorships and entrench the government’s role as a global arms dealer, they also provide credibility and cover for some of the most authoritarian states in the world.

Most importantly, they put weapons in the hands of despots and send out the message that the human rights and democracy are of less importance than arms company profits.

They can not simply be tweaked or reformed, they need to be abolished.

The next DSEI will be taking place in 2017. Already, different groups are talking about how to take action and make sure that this time we shut it down for good. If the #StopDSEI defendants have inspired you, then join us in making a pledge to take action when the arms fair returns next year.


Andrew Smith is a spokesperson for Campaign Against Arms Trade and tweets at @CAATuk

Leave a Reply


More Ideas

More In Politics

More In Features

More In Profiles

More In Arts & Culture