Politics | Reverend and Quaker activist found not guilty after trying to disarm BAE fighter jets headed for Yemen

Activist Sam Walton and Rev Daniel Woodhouse have been acquitted after breaking-in to BAE Systems factory to ‘disarm’ Typhoon fighter jets.

New in Ceasefire, Politics - Posted on Thursday, October 26, 2017 15:15 - 2 Comments

By

Share

This afternoon, Reverend Daniel Woodhouse and Sam Walton, a Quaker activist from London, were found not guilty at Burnley Magistrates Court, following their arrest for trying to disarm Typhoon fighter jets at BAE Systems’ site in Warton, Lancashire on 29 January 2017.

Their aim had been to stop the jets, which had Saudi markings painted on them, from going to Saudi Arabia where they would be used to support the ongoing bombing of Yemen. Sam and Daniel successfully argued that their intention was to save innocent lives and prevent war crimes, by physically disabling the warplanes.

The two campaigners broke in via a fence on the perimeter of the site, and got within five feet of the warplanes before being stopped by BAE security.

The court heard evidence about the scale of the brutal bombardment, and the many serious accusations of war crimes that have been made against the Royal Saudi Air Force.

In delivering comments on his judgement District Judge James Clarke said: “They were impressive and eloquent men who held strong views about what they were doing and what they wanted to achieve. They impressed me as being natural in their delivery and honest throughout their evidence…”

“I heard about their belief of BAE’s role in the supply of aircraft to Saudi Arabia. I heard about their beliefs regarding the events in Yemen, that they include the death of civilians and the destruction of civilian property, and the basis for their belief that this amounted to war crimes…”

“However, having considered in full the defence under sec 5 Criminal Damage Act 1971, I find the defendants not guilty.”

Since the bombing of Yemen began in March 2015, the UK has licensed £3.8 billion worth of arms to Saudi Arabia, including:

  • £2.6 billion worth of ML10 licences (Aircraft, helicopters, drones)    
  • £1.1 billion worth of ML4 licences (Grenades, bombs, missiles, countermeasures)    
  • £572,000 worth of ML6 licences (Armoured vehicles, tanks)    

In a joint statement, Sam and Daniel said: “We did not want to take this action, but were compelled to do so in order to stop the UK government’s complicity in the destruction of Yemen. Thousands of people have been killed in the brutal bombardment, while companies like BAE Systems have profited every step of the way.

This vindication from the Courts is further evidence of the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy that underpins so much of UK foreign policy. It is time for the government to stop putting arms company profits ahead of human rights. We do not regret taking action, and would do it again in a heartbeat. The only thing we regret is that we were not able to finish the job.”

See also:

Interview | Lowkey: On Militarism, Foreign Policy and the Arms Trade [VIDEO]
Comment | Saudi’s bombing is destroying my country, Yemen, and Britain is helping them do it
Special Report | What was Theresa May actually doing in Saudi Arabia? And who was she doing it for?

Share
Ceasefire Bites

Ceasefire Bites is Ceasefire's news and opinion blog.

2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Margaret
Oct 27, 2017 11:56

Hello! This is the first I’ve heard about this! I’m so glad the decision went your way. Courage like yours is to be much admired and applauded. C’mon the good guys!!!!
Maggie

Ann Fuller
Oct 28, 2017 0:04

Speaking truth to power can open other eyes, as well, even if power does not change immediately. Everyone who saw a newspaper article about your actions has been awakened to the often invisible corporate profit from needless death and suffering. The long arm of history bends toward justice; I am grateful for your part in accelerating that change!

Leave a Reply

Comment

 

More Ideas

More In Politics

More In Features

More In Profiles

More In Arts & Culture