Diary of a Domestic Extremist – The EDL: Street fighting for the establishment

The last 18 months has seen the meteroic rise of the EDL. In two weeks, they are planning to organise a protest in Bradford, their 'Big One'. In his new piece, Mikhail Goldman provides a powerful analysis of the socio-political reasons behind the popularity of the EDL and provides a few pointers as to how the response to it should be; puncturing, in the process, a number of myths and illusions that are harboured by both EDL supporters and their opponents.

Columns, Diary of a Domestic Extremist - Posted on Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:38 - 10 Comments

Share

By Mikhail Goldman

Unless you’ve been living off grid in the Highlands for the past 18 months, the emergence and meteoric rise of the English Defence League won’t be news. Going from a handful of BNP members in Luton to a network capable of mobilising thousands in under a year, the EDL have shaken up Britain’s far right and pointed them in a new (old) direction. Whilst the BNP lurch from internal split to desperate purge, failing to make progress with their electoral strategy and haemorhaging funds, the EDL are taking the extreme right back onto the streets. In a little under two weeks’ time, they are planning ‘the big one’ – a provocative demonstration on the streets of Bradford, designed to goad local Muslim youths into confrontation and fill the media with talk of race riots.

As I said before, none of this is news, so why write another article about the EDL? Because, despite an abundance of analyses, few people seem to be getting to grips with this worrying development, and even fewer have been able to successfully challenge this phenomenon.

Let’s start with the EDL’s own view of what they stand for, before moving on to some more critical views. The EDL claim to be fighting against ‘Islamic extremism’. They claim to share the paranoid fantasy, wilfully encouraged by some of the tabloids, that Britain is on the verge of takeover by shadowy Islamist forces who will impose Shariah law and halal food on the nation. This imminent threat, like the equally fictitious imminent threat of WMD in Iraq, is useful in mobilising people to a reactionary cause. The terms ‘Islamic extremism’ and ‘moderate Muslims’ are loaded. We never hear a similar distinction being made about adherents to other religions; no one calls for moderate Buddhists to deal with the extremists in their midst. The language has been used to pathologise those who follow Islam. Even those who don’t pose a threat, the ‘moderates’, are suspect. The EDL swallow this categorisation uncritically. Perhaps it is because there are a number of fundamentalist Christians and Zionists within the EDL that this blindspot is cultivated.

But even according to the rules of the ‘evil Islam’ game, the EDL seem to slip up time and time again. Rather than focussing on the most authoritarian and uncompromising preachers and doctrines the EDL’s actions seem to target all Muslims equally. They target the building of all new mosques, not just those that give a platform to intolerant speakers. They use pigs heads and Israeli flags to provoke the entire Muslim community. They do not make any attempt to engage ‘moderate Muslims’ because they don’t believe that moderate Muslims exist. The same organisation that demonises the burqa, supposedly out of a concern for women’s rights, is dominated by men and has banned its few female members from coming to Bradford. Just like the patriarchal Muslim men they claim to oppose, the EDL think that women need men to look after them. Their opposition to ‘extremist Islam’ is a flimsy cover for racial violence.

The EDL claim to be a politically neutral, single-issue campaign against ‘extremist Islam’ but recently they have started turning up to left-wing and anarchist political meetings in attempts to intimidate and harrass people they see as their ideological enemies. A Palestine solidarity demo in Birmingham and an Indymedia meeting in Sheffield have recently been threatened by members of the EDL and they regularly share details of left-wing meetings on their forums. This is classic fascist activity reminiscent of the National Front in the ’70s and ’80s. They also seem to have strong affinity with loyalists in Northern Ireland, often incorporating the red hand of Ulster and the slogan ‘No Surrender’ into their symbolism. These are further proofs that the EDL are drawing on the legacy of far-right street movements and are not the benign pressure group they try to present themselves as.

So, what do critics of the EDL make of all this? the first category of anti-EDL analysis, and the most shallow, claims that the EDL are just the BNP in disguise; fascists disillusioned with electioneering going back to the streets for a bit of action. Whilst there certainly are many outright fascists and neo-Nazis within the EDL, the phenomenon is much more diverse than that. I call it a phenomenon rather than an organisation because, in contrast to the BNP or the National Front, the EDL are relatively decentralised and work as a network with similar views on a cluster of themes including Islam and Englishness.

Whilst there is a hierarchy, with spokesmen (and yes, they are all men), organisers and stewards there is not the same requirement of ideological homogeneity that is found in the parties of the far right. It is this looseness of structure that makes the EDL a broad church, taking in non-ideological racists, football hooligans fed up of police crackdowns and, importantly, working class men disillusioned with mainstream politics, as well as the usual fascists. To call them all Nazis reveals the poverty of analysis offered by groups like Unite Against Fascism, and is counterproductive, giving credibility to the EDL’s claims to be a radical, anti-establishment voice, when in fact they are conservative and reactionary.

Then there are those who see the EDL as a phenomenon on the battlefield of the class war. They look for big money backers, pointing to people like Alan Lake, a millionaire businessman who is supposed to fund the EDL, as evidence that the EDL has been engineered by the ruling classes to divide and rule the working class. Advocates of this analysis say that disillusioned workers within the EDL are being duped into supporting the ruling classes’ ‘war on terror’ and pose socialist redistribution of wealth and/or class warfare as a genuine alternative to mainstream politics. There is certainly increasing evidence that the EDL are considerably more ideological than they claim to be, with their website encouraging members to vote UKIP during the election and branding striking workers as ‘commies’. But this class analysis fails if it doesn’t incorporate the potent far right standards of race and Britishness.

Whatever its spokesmen may claim, the EDL is all about racism. When their demos degenerate from drunken chest-beating into outright violence, it is always Asian targets, be they shops, taxis, temples or people, who are on the receiving end. The EDL claim to be against Islamism but the reality is that their base of support comes from people who hate ‘Pakis’. They often draw the most support and recruit the most members in areas where tensions between white and Asian communities are high, like Stoke-on-Trent, Dudley and Bolton. It is wrong to assume that their members are predominantly old school racists, who hate everyone who isn’t white enough. Rather, these racists seem to be more motivated by cultural difference and the manufactured idea of a clash of civilisations. Whilst Britain’s Carribean migrants are often considered by such people to be acceptably Christian and hedonistic, the much more culturally challenging values of immigrants from South Asia and the Middle East are seen as a threat to be neutered or annihilated. Using racialised ideas about cultural difference the street fighters go into battle against anything Asian or Muslim.

The concerns that members of the EDL have, that they can’t support their families because there aren’t any jobs for them, that resources and services are being unequally distributed, are, of course, entirely valid. The capitalist economy, maintained in order to benefit the capitalist ruling classes at the expense of everyone else, ensures that there is a constant supply of misery for the excluded. The arch-capitalists put a lot of time and effort into making sure that those who are being shafted don’t realise the cause of their problems. That means finding false enemies to displace dispossessed people’s anger onto, like Muslims, ‘chavs’, asylum seekers and ‘benefit cheats’. The corporate media, owned and controlled by capitalists, are happy to propagate the scapegoating of these groups. The anger of poor people about their condition gets diverted away from legitimate targets and towards even more vulnerable groups. Of course, some groups make particularly good scapegoats for the establishment. Given the context of the ‘war on terror’, an ideological smokescreen for the plunder of the Middle East, it is very convenient for the western powers to demonise Muslim ‘extremists’. Not only does it take the heat off them at home, it helps build support for their wars abroad.

Ultimately, although they see themselves as striking a blow against the establishment, the footsoldiers of the EDL are helping to prop the establishment up. The Britain that they support is one that will only accept them as insignificant subordinates, as expendable troops to be brutally beaten by the police and imprisoned by the courts if they stray too far from the script. However many ‘Islamic extremists’ they chase out of town, they will still be without jobs and functional communities because they have failed to take on the system that is running the show. They have been bought out by the crumbs from the capitalists’ table – a tiny share in the spoils of western plunder and a rung on the ladder just a little higher than destitution.

The Bradford demo could be a critical moment for the EDL. If they succeed in creating chaos and widespread violence, the powers that be may decide that they have stepped too far out of control and suppress the movement with all the powers at the state’s disposal. If the ‘big one’ fails to materialise after all the hype, the EDL may run out of steam with its members leaving in droves to find better places to get their kicks. Whilst it is important for those who are prepared to resist the division of our communities to show solidarity with the Asian comunity in Bradford, it is also extremely important to expose the role that the EDL plays in dividing and conquering dissent. It is vital that we build effective movements of resistance to the capitalist system and draw support away from reactionary street movements and the mainstream politics that has swindled so many.

Mikhail Goldman, (a.k.a. The Domestic Extremist) currently focusses his trouble-making and incitement in the Midlands area. His favourite activities are bringing down the system and enjoying a good cup of tea.

Share

10 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

josh
Aug 19, 2010 17:35

This article is incredible. Probably the best thing I’ve read regarding the EDL and their motives/reasons for existence. Very refreshing to read an intelligent analysis which looks both within and beyond racism.

Tom
Aug 20, 2010 1:02

As you point out, the EDL’s rise to super stardom has been meteoric, and the media have most certainly played their part. This has led me and others to wonder out loud if the hidden hand of Britain’s intelligence services doesn’t have something to do with it.

It certainly wouldn’t be the first time they have created far right groups, it came out several years ago that the leader of the largest far-right party in post-war Europe was working for MI6 at the time he founded the organisation, and had MI6 handlers throughout his notorious career as Germany’s most prominent neo-nazi politician: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/aug/13/johnhooper

“Germany’s most notorious postwar neo-Nazi party was led by an intelligence agent working for the British, according to both published and unpublished German sources.

The alleged agent – the late Adolf von Thadden – came closer than anyone to giving the far-right real influence over postwar German politics.

Under his leadership, the National Democratic party (NPD) made a string of impressive showings in regional elections in the late 60s, and there were widespread fears that it would gain representation in the federal parliament.”

Two years ago it came out in court that Hal Turner, a fairly small-time racist radio host in the U.S. had been working for the FBI all along… Turner was a relative unknown but shot to fame when CNN featured him in a piece on white nationalists: http://www.infowars.com/hal-turner-admits-he-worked-for-the-fbi/ and http://www.infowars.com/fbi%E2%80%99s-racist-shock-jock-hal-turner-convicted-of-threatening-judges/

The CNN piece can be viewed here, astounding in the context of what would come out shortly afterwards: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H14sowqqH9Q

MI5 have also been going around threatening Muslim community leaders that if they don’t act as informants for the agency, there are going to be ramifications: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-how-mi5-blackmails-british-muslims-1688618.html

“An agent who gave her name as Katherine is alleged to have made direct threats to Adydarus Elmi, a 25-year-old cinema worker from north London. In one telephone call she rang him at 7am to congratulate him on the birth of his baby girl. His wife was still seven months’ pregnant and the couple had expressly told the hospital that they did not want to know the sex of their child.

Mr Elmi further alleges: “Katherine tried to threaten me by saying, and it still runs through my mind now: ‘Remember, this won’t be the last time we ever meet.’ And then during our last conversation she explained: ‘If you do not want anything to happen to your family you will co-operate.’””

I have no proof whatsoever that MI5 are handling the EDL, but it definitely wouldn’t be the first time. Elements within the government have an interest in stoking conflict and getting everyone to fight with each other.

Something about this group doesn’t seem right, they seem to be too well organised, too well funded and above all far too well covered by the media to be an entirely organic organisation.

Mik
Aug 20, 2010 8:20

“Something about this group doesn’t seem right, they seem to be too well organised, too well funded and above all far too well covered by the media to be an entirely organic organisation.”

I don’t think they’re that well organised. No more organised than a rather big footie firm and those guys are well rehearsed at evading the police, etc. I’m not sure why people always talk about their funds either. What funds do they need? They probably chip in themselves for their transport (they mostly seem to be white collar workers rather than unemployed) and what other costs they have are probably met by their merchandising and donations. They seem to have a few rich backers (and it might be worth speculating on their motives). And as to why they get so much media attention – they are following the tabloid agenda almost word for word (rather than setting it). Also, sadly, they’re the biggest threat to public order going in the country now that anti-globalisation protests have run their course. That’s fodder for both conservative and liberal media to get excited about.

The EDL could be an intelligence services project but I see no evidence for it. It seems a rather risky strategy for them although western intelligence agencies aren’t beyond orchestrating outrages (see Gladio for example). I don’t actually think it matters too much who’s ‘leading’ the EDL or providing the money because they’ve clearly recruited at least a few thousand footsoldiers to their cause. It’s them that we have to deal with.

Johnny Blaze
Aug 22, 2010 19:59

Interesting piece about links with the Zionist Federation: http://www.organizedrage.com/2010/08/zionist-federation-threaten-legal.html

Jamal
Aug 24, 2010 12:45

Excellent analysis, especially with regard to explaining the weakness of like UAF’s position on the EDL.

I would side with Mik rather than Tom with regard to the MI5 connection though – there isn’t much evidence that the EDL are especially well-organised or well-funded.

Their objective is to act as far-right vanguardists but this has largely failed so far, and their numbers are very small when you consider how much latent Islamophobia and racism exists in Britain (cf. any tabloid, every day).

They obviously do present a threat to communities, especially Muslim communities, and could incite a fair bit of violence, but it is important not to overstate the case here. Their biggest demonstration was supposedly the Dudley one where (they claim) 3,000 supporters turned up. For a national demonstration that is miniscule. Hardly a “meteoric” rise – although (as Mik points out) the media have good reason to exaggerate.

Mik
Aug 24, 2010 16:41

“Their biggest demonstration was supposedly the Dudley one where (they claim) 3,000 supporters turned up. For a national demonstration that is miniscule.”

It would be miniscule for, say, a peaceful demonstration against the Iraq war. But these 3,000 include a sizeable proportion who are intent on kicking off against anything they deem to be Muslim. In terms of people willing to take militant action that’s quite big. Not as big as summit mobilisations or some of the Gaza demonstrations, but still a threat.

I do agree that their size has been hyped, though. They are a tiny minority.

Jamal
Aug 25, 2010 17:03

“In terms of people willing to take militant action that’s quite big.”

I don’t think it is — you could probably find more people willing to take militant action for much more unpopular causes, like animal rights — and even if it is a comparatively big group, which I doubt, it still hardly justifies phrases like “meteoric rise.”

This article makes this point well, I think — lack of a proper (and realistic) analysis of movements like these hardly works in our favour.

Paul The Octopus
Oct 31, 2010 17:22

People who, ‘do not like’ Islam very often are unable to express themselves as they would really like. Let me express myself this way.

I could invent a cure for cancer that saved ten members of a muslim family. I could rescue the entire family from certain death in a house fire and I could win the Euromillions lottery and give it all to the local mosque. However if one of my sons and a muslim girl were to fall in love (as nature intended) the girl would be alienated from her, ‘community’ or even worse, before her family would accept it. Please would someone explain to me how this is right? Anyone – and I mean anyone – who would not allow any of their children to freely mix in with and inter-marry in this couunty should be deported. Today.

Fred Harris
Jan 28, 2011 14:04

What a load of twaddle.

Let’s take this statement as an example of the lies being spread in just one single sentence.

“The EDL claim to be a politically neutral, single-issue campaign against ‘extremist Islam’ but recently they have started turning up to left-wing and anarchist political meetings in attempts to intimidate and harrass people they see as their ideological enemies.”

Recently, there have been public meetings in which lies about the EDL have been expressed. Present in some of those meetings were 2 or three EDL members who had attended to present their side. I cannot see how a roomful of people can be intimidated by – in once case 2 women and a gentleman. In fact that particular nasty episode of fascist behaviour from the Left/Anarchists show quite clearly the complete disregard to freedom of speech and to the truth.

The author of this pointless drivel clearly has done no real investigations into the EDL, has never interacted with members of the EDL but has simply taken a position contrary to the EDL and attempts to slate them at every opportunity disregarding the realities and truths expressed by the EDL.

I wouldn’t give this author the time of day with anything he/she reports. It’ll just be lies dressed with a few facts designed to mislead the ignorant.

Spend time and research Islam, read the Koran and the Hadith, study the Sunnah and read the Tafsir on the Koran and you will reach the same conclusions as the counter-jihad movement. Don’t rely on left wing , Frankfurt School propaganda and lies.

dfklsdg
Jul 23, 2013 22:53

Why don’t you Jews die off already or go cause multiculturalism and chaos in YOUR OWN FUCKING HOMELAND, Goldman?

Leave a Reply

Comment

 

More in Media

More Ideas

More In Politics

More In Features

More In Profiles

More In Arts & Culture