Comment | Blood for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism

Adam Elliott-Cooper looks at the geo-strategic and economic interests shaping the current French intervention in Mali.

Ideas, New in Ceasefire - Posted on Thursday, January 17, 2013 16:37 - 24 Comments

Share

By

french troops

France opened 2013 with a series of airstrikes on Northern Mali to prevent “the establishment of a terrorist state”. At the time of writing, 11 civilians (including two children) have been killed, and according to the UN, an estimated 30,000 have been displaced. The morbid irony of the France’s leaders bombing people in order to prevent a “terrorist state” appears to be lost on them, but this may be due to their eyes being on something far more important – Mali’s economy.

The invasion of Iraq in 2003 as part of the ‘Global War on Terror’ was a war in which France refused to directly participate. The general consensus is that the invasion of Iraq was a quest for oil, and yet the French invasion of Mali is not dissimilar.

Like its neighbour, Niger, Mali is rich in a number of resources, including uranium. Following the ‘oil shock’ of 1973 in which the oil producing nations sharply increased the price of oil, the French decided an alternative route was needed. This alternative was nuclear energy, and over the 15 years following the shock, France built 56 nuclear reactors, more than any other country in the world. France now has 59 nuclear reactors, generating nearly 80% of its electricity, making it the world’s largest net electricity exporter. In 1999, the French parliament confirmed three objectives in relation to this newly found wealth, the first: security of supply.

Activists in Niger protesting foreign mining companies

Activists in Niger protesting foreign mining companies

This ‘security’ has been challenged by labour unions and social movements across the region, such as Almoustapha Alhacen of Aghirin, who found that the local drinking water had been contaminated with alpha and beta radioactivity levels which did not meet EU or World Health Organisation standards.

Demonstrations in Niger against uranium mining company AREVA, which also operates in Mali, became so popular that AREVA president Mme Anne Lauvergeon had to fly over in an effort to reassure the population.

Inspired by this, Malian citizens set up community organisations in mining areas, such as Falea, protesting environmental degradation and the outflow of resources to foreign beneficiaries. Although Niger has been France’s primary uranium trading partner in the region, investors are currently estimating 5,200 tonnes of untapped uranium sources in Mali, making the requirements of a favourable government and a suppressed civil society all the more urgent.

A section of the Northern Mali population is Tuareg. The Tuareg, like  other colonised nations, are split across the artificial borders constructed by the French, specifically where Northern Mali meets Niger. Tuareg on both sides of this border have been campaigning and fighting for secular autonomy since independence in the 1960s, and there has been a resurgence following the ethnic cleansing of Tuareg and other sub-Sahara Africans from Libya by the NATO-backed, Al-Qaeda affiliated rebels. In this context, a united Tuareg resistance has the potential to erode power from the central Mali government, and even control areas of land in which the Tuareg live, but the French want to mine.

In order to justify the invasion, the threat of Islamist terror had to at least appear tangible. According to Dr Jeremy Keenan, of SOAS, University of London:

“In 2004, President Tandja attempted to provoke the Tuareg into actions which could be portrayed to the Americans as ‘former rebels turning to terrorism’. He arrested and gaoled Rhissa ag Boula, the former leader of the rebel Front de Libération de l’Azawak et de l’Aïr (FLAA) and its signatory to the 1995 Peace Accord and subsequently a government minister, on a trumped up murder charge. He was released without charge after 13 months, but not until a number of Tuareg had been provoked into taking up arms. That enabled the government to send some 150 of its newly US-trained troops into the Tuareg stronghold of the Aïr Mountains”.

From that point on, the governments of both Mali and Niger were able to engage a relatively unwilling Tuareg in combat, which gave rise to the Al-Qaeda affiliates currently controlling cities in Northern Mali.

This transition facilitated not only US support, but the subsequent invasion. Unlike Iraq, the interests of France and the US are converging over military policy, with Africom, America’s militarisation of the continent, providing the infrastructure for drones and other aircraft to support the current French-led invasion.

David Cameron announced that the British army would be providing its French counterpart with logistical support in the conflict, explaining that such support is “in our interests”. It remains to be established whether he was referring to the war on terror, or the fact that the UK relies hugely on the French state-run energy firm, EDF.

Of course, militarised forms of imperialism have negative consequences for the ‘home’ nations too. With Britain and the US on constant terror alert, France is now tightening its domestic security, continuing the process of control over land, people and resources.

The echoes of the scramble for Iraq’s resources, and the humanitarian catastrophe which followed are stark. The curbs on civil liberties in the West which the so-called War on Terror forces upon citizens is part of the same struggle that activists in West Africa are fighting against uranium mining corporations. Only by building links of solidarity between our continents can people begin to resist the disastrous intersection of the energy industries and state militarism both at home, and abroad.

Adam Elliott-Cooper

Adam Elliott-Cooper, a writer and activist, is Associate Editor of Ceasefire and a doctoral researcher at the University of Oxford. His column on race politics appears twice a month. He tweets at @adamec87.

Share

24 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Pete
Jan 17, 2013 22:37

Wow. I shouldn’t be surprised, of course, but why is this only being reported in a small independent magazine? Our media is a total joke.

Chidi
Jan 17, 2013 23:46

Strange I can’t see any reference to Mali and its travails until the French turned up. Somehow by a vigorous Google search a case has been built as to how the French are going in to seize undiscovered, unexploited, yet to be opened uranium mines.
The biggest threat to Nigerien mines is not organised labour but terrorism.
There are other uranium mines in Niger being exploited by the Chinese and others.
11 people have been killed since bombing began?
How many have been killed in the past year? These 30,000 refugees are from 6 days?
The French destroyed tombs in Timbukto, burnt ancient manuscripts and imposed sharia law.
Seriously people should concentrate on things they no about and leave Africans alone if they have nothing sensible to say. The people of Mali do not wish to live under sharia law imposed by Algerians or fundamentalist Tauregs, they requested French help as well as ECOWAS. Understand the situation first before commenting

France’s war in Mali: it’s really all about uranium « Antinuclear
Jan 18, 2013 3:21

[...] for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism http://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/blood-uranium-frances-mali-intervention-terrorism/ Adam Elliott-Cooper looks at the geo-strategic and economic interests shaping the current French [...]

It’s the uranium, stupid! France’s war in Mali « nuclear-news
Jan 18, 2013 4:07

[...] for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism http://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/blood-uranium-frances-mali-intervention-terrorism/ Adam Elliott-Cooper looks at the geo-strategic and economic interests shaping the current French [...]

Blood for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism « idleronahammock
Jan 18, 2013 9:04

[...] The geo-strategic and economic interests shaping the current French intervention in Mali [...]

MALI AND TERRORISM « DUCKPOND
Jan 18, 2013 15:25

[...] Adam Elliot-Cooper, Blood for Uranium: France’s Mali Intervention has little to do with Islamic Terrorism (Ceasefire) [...]

France needs Mali’s uranium » StraightGoods.ca
Jan 23, 2013 21:52

[...] Source [...]

Gilbert Mercier
Jan 25, 2013 18:48

My article published on 1/14/2013 under the title “Mali: France’s Neo-Colonial War for Uranium?” must have been part of your “research”…..

The reason why French troops are fighting Malian “rebels” | The Liberty Wall
Feb 3, 2013 15:54

The future of the British anti-war movement « Though Cowards Flinch
Feb 3, 2013 20:56

[...] comes to the Mali conflict there are attempts to pin the French decision to go intervene in Mali on the link between uranium deposits and its dependence on nuclear [...]

GPJA #453: GAZA REPORT – Hear UK documentary maker & activist Harry Fear Thursday Feb 7 « GPJA's Blog
Feb 5, 2013 5:47

[...] Blood for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism http://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/blood-uranium-frances-mali-intervention-terrorism/ [...]

Blood for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism | maraahmed.com
Feb 9, 2013 6:15

[...] “In 2004, President Tandja attempted to provoke the Tuareg into actions which could be portrayed to the Americans as ‘former rebels turning to terrorism’. He arrested and gaoled Rhissa ag Boula, the former leader of the rebel Front de Libération de l’Azawak et de l’Aïr (FLAA) and its signatory to the 1995 Peace Accord and subsequently a government minister, on a trumped up murder charge. He was released without charge after 13 months, but not until a number of Tuareg had been provoked into taking up arms. That enabled the government to send some 150 of its newly US-trained troops into the Tuareg stronghold of the Aïr Mountains”. (Adam Elliott-Cooper) More here. [...]

Garamanti
Feb 9, 2013 7:22

French play with the stupid African leaders , she wants them to be in fight all time to justify her intervention in the region. But those mindless African leaders never understand. They never get independence, France did set them free yet. France lacks to ship them to Europe. lol

Mali war – more to do with uranium than with terrorism « uranium news
Feb 11, 2013 7:45

[...] for Uranium: France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism http://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/blood-uranium-frances-mali-intervention-terrorism/ Adam Elliott-Cooper looks at the geo-strategic and economic interests shaping the current French [...]

pete
Feb 15, 2013 20:56

intresting theories, time will tell

George
Mar 6, 2013 1:07

@chidi

you should follow your example.

Ingérence impérialiste française au Mali: Le saviez-vous ?… | Resistance71 Blog
Mar 12, 2013 4:55

[...] Elliott-Cooper, « Blood for Uranium : France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism » (Du sang pour l’uranium : L’intervention française au Mali n’a pas grand-chose à voir [...]

Le saviez-vous ? Quelques faits révélateurs à propos de la guerre au Mali |
Mar 12, 2013 9:31

[...] China » (La guerre au Mali et l’agenda d’AFRICOM/ Cibler la Chine) Adam Elliott-Cooper, « Blood for Uranium : France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism » (Du sang pour l’uranium : L’intervention française au Mali n’a pas grand-chose à voir [...]

La guerre au Mali pour les nuls | lavoixpeuhle.info - Les Nouvelles du Fouta et des Peuhls
Mar 13, 2013 17:22

[...] Elliott-Cooper, « Blood for Uranium : France’s Mali intervention has little to do with terrorism » (Du sang pour l’uranium : L’intervention française au Mali n’a pas grand-chose à voir [...]

The Parallels between Iraq and Mali | endofwar.ca
Mar 14, 2013 2:00

The Parallels between Iraq and Mali | endofwar.ca
Mar 14, 2013 2:00

The Parallels between Iraq and Mali | endofwar.ca
Mar 14, 2013 2:00

German militarism in the Middle East and Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Feb 17, 2014 13:15

[...] is currently being carried out by several companies with clear indications of deposits of uranium in Mali. Uranium potential is located in the Falea area which covers 150 km² of the Falea-North Guinea [...]

where is Mali and why should i care? Conflict in Timbuktu | evilvonscary.com
Jul 19, 2014 19:11

[...] interests seem largely centered around uranium ( a strategic resource ) as well the mining at this point seems more important than potential gas and oil [...]

Leave a Reply

Comment

 

More in Media

More Ideas

More In Politics

More In Features

More In Profiles

More In Arts & Culture