Editorial | Nick Robinson: how (not) to report a planned war crime
Editor's Desk, New in Ceasefire - Posted on Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:23 - 8 Comments
By Hicham Yezza
Nick Robinson, the BBC’s political editor.
The BBC’s political editor, Nick Robinson, has written a piece, published on the Beeb’s news website, that begins “Senior ministers are discussing how Britain would respond in the event of a military confrontation between Israel and Iran later this year,” explaining, further down, that “UK ministers are discussing not just the possibility of a military confrontation but what role, if any, Britain might play and whether any involvement would be legal.”
You might remember that Israel has been threatening Iran with an attack for years now. Polls indicate the British population (as well as Iranian, US and Israeli ones) show significant opposition to any such illegal act of aggression.
At first sight, the official British response ought to be rather straightforward: condemn the threat, assist the UN in whatever efforts it undertakes to either prevent or stop the aggression, and ensure Israel is punished with sanctions and diplomatic ostracism if it does proceed with attacking its neighbour.
Readers will thus be shocked (shocked!) to learn that UK coalition ministers are entertaining rather different plans. To quote Robinson:
“They are looking at options ranging from British diplomatic support for Israel through to the possible involvement of the Royal Navy in the region.”
This is interesting on two counts. First, not only is the UK government planning to take a course of action that goes against international law and public opinion, but it is effectively putting every UK resident at risk by making us all de-facto complicit in an act of international war criminality.
If the Bolivian government had announced it would be offering diplomatic support and possibly military assistance to Argentina in the event of an attack by its neighbour on British positions in the Falklands, we would be expected to take for granted that any Bolivian officials, companies or even ordinary citizens, should be treated with suspicion and watched closely, possibly even deported or detained just in case. Yet this is precisely what the coalition government has nonchalantly inflicted on the UK population without mandate or consultation.
Secondly, Robinson seems to find this rather unremarkable, boring even. There is nothing in his piece that suggests he is alarmed at, or even aware of, the serious implications of his own news item. Critical issues of legality get the most tangential of mentions, while public reservations about the attack, including by senior military, diplomatic and security personnel in the US, Israel and elsewhere, are presumably too irrelevant in Robinson’s eyes to merit inclusion.
Of course, that a conservative-led coalition government is acting against the interest of its own population is hardly breaking news. That a public broadcasting institution such as the BBC is furthering and disseminating the official party line is to be expected. That Nick Robinson – him of ‘Nick vs Placard’ fame (see video above) – is reliably on message here is what Nick Robinson is reliably expected to be.
But is political life in the UK so emaciated and numb that this fairly consequential news item has so far met with little more than indifference and some faint murmurings from the radical fringes? Does the Labour Party, for instance, have nothing to say about this? Did it not insist it had “learned” from its Iraq war fiasco? From the “Bradford Spring”? Will the Lib-Dem’s deathwish pursuit never end?
An attack on Iran might or might not happen. As many have already pointed out, by ratcheting his thuggish blackmailing over a possible attack, Netenyahu has arguably achieved far more in terms of crippling Iran, through sanctions and destabilisation, than would have been possible with an actual attack.
The fact remains: faced with months of jingoistic howling from the Israelis, the British political and media class, across the spectrum, has responded with either pathetic resignation or, more predictably, with some enthusiastic cheerleading of its own. As British soldiers continue to arrive from Afghanistan in coffins, almost on a daily basis, those who sent them to their demise are not done yet.
The late Harry Patch, the last surviving veteran of the World War I trenches, called war the “calculated and condoned slaughter of human beings”. If leaders can’t agree, Patch poignantly and pointedly said “give them a rifle each and let them fight it out.”
Robinson, as well as anyone in politics or media who thinks war is the answer, should be made to listen to Patch’s haunting words over and over again, for weeks on end, until the message sticks. If that doesn’t drive some sense into them, then maybe giving them a rifle each and sending them over to the trenches will.